Analyzing the Application of Speech Act Theory in Editorial Emails of Rejected Manuscripts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.727.739Słowa kluczowe:
Application of Speech Act Theory, Editorial Emails, Rejected Manuscripts, self-efficacy, inclusive education, sustainable development goalsAbstrakt
Aim. This paper discusses the use of Speech Act Theory to analyze editorial emails that reject an academic manuscript. The study investigates how the editorial decisions are communicated with different levels of polite, impolite, polite direct and polite assertive language in the analyzed emails' linguistic structure and pragmatic aspects.
Methods. Building on the taxonomy of speech acts proposed by John Searle, the study establishes the most common types of speech acts and their roles in rejection communication. The study will establish how editors conduct themselves as they display professionalism while giving negative feedback that could be emotionally uncomfortable to the individuals involved in the work.
Results. This research work contributes to the knowledge of pragmatic features in professional discourse to suggest improvements in academic publishing communication practice, and to improve the editor-author relationships.
Conclusion. Potential implications of this work include developing better fitting templates for the editorial correspondence that accommodate the communicative purpose and interpersonal relations.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719
Kourilová, M. (1998). Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non‑native users of English. Endocrine Regulations, 32, 107–114.
Murphy, J. (2015). Revisiting the apology as a speech act: The case of parliamentary apologies. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.01mur
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Zeb, S., Ajmal, M., Pavlikova, M., Alam, S., Ahmad, F., & Banu, S. (2024). One word and multiple senses: John Locke’s philosophy of abuse of language. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 417. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p417
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Sohaib Alam, Muhammad Ajmal, Shaista Zeb , Bahia Khalifa Ibrahim Mohammed, Anam Shams, Tariq Rasheed

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.

