Use of Copyrighted Works for Education and Research in EU Law

Authors

  • Ingrīda Veikša Faculty of Law, Turiba University, Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.159.172

Keywords:

education, copyright exception, secure electronic environment, illustrative purpose, harmonisation of rights

Abstract

Aim. This research aims to analyse the legal framework governing the use of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes within the European Union (EU). It focuses on the balance between authors’ rights and public interest, emphasising exceptions codified in the InfoSoc Directive (2001/29/EC) and the CDSM Directive (2019/790), with comparative insights from selected EU Member States.

Methods. The research employs a comparative legal analysis of EU directives and national legislation across Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary, France, Germany, Spain, Poland, Slovenia, Finland, and Switzerland.

Results. Findings reveal significant divergence in national implementation. Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary, France, and Switzerland offer full exceptions without remuneration. Finland uses extended collective licensing, while countries like Slovenia, Poland, Spain, and Germany adopt hybrid models requiring partial compensation. The CDSM Directive enhances digital and cross-border educational use, but national discretion leads to uneven application.

Conclusions. EU copyright law provides a structured yet flexible framework for educational use, but harmonisation remains incomplete. Clearer guidelines and broader awareness are needed to ensure lawful use of copyrighted materials in academia while safeguarding creators’ rights. Early intellectual property education and simplified licensing systems could further support compliance and innovation.

Originality. This research contributes original insights by evaluating the implementation practice of EU directives in the laws of different countries, revealing the interplay between harmonised legal norms and national educational practices. It advances cognitive understanding by identifying four core criteria - educational institution, non-commercial purpose, secure electronic environment, and illustrative purpose as the pillars of lawful educational use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cohen J. H. (2005). Restrictions on copyright and their abuse. European Intellectually Property Review, 27(10), 359-364.

European Parliament and Council. (2001, May). Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. OJ L 167, 22.6.2001 (InfoSoc Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029

European Parliament and Council. (2019, April). Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (CDSM Directive). OJ L 130, 17.5.2019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32019L0790

Eversheds Bitāns. (2010). Skaidrojums par autortiesību un blakustiesību objektu izmantošanu mācību procesā [Explanation on the use of copyright and related rights objects in the educational process]. https://www.tip.edu.lv/media/files/2015_%20PII_skaidrojums_par_autortiesibam.pdf

Gulbis, R., & Tomsone, I. (2013). Autortiesību ierobežošana izglītības un zinātniskās pētniecības mērķiem [Copyright restrictions for educational and scientific research purposes]. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, 4, 26-39. https://journal.lu.lv/jull/article/view/229

International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property. (2015). Study Question Q246 “Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for libraries, archives and educational and research institutions”. https://aippi.soutron.net/Portal/Default/en-GB/DownloadImageFile.ashx?objectId=7544&ownerType=0&ownerId=844

International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Latvian National Group. (2025). AIPPI is the leading non-governmental organization dedicated to the development and improvement of laws for the protection of in. http://www.aippi.lv/en/

Kalnaja-Zelca, I., Bitans, A., & Veiksa, I. (2015). Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for libraries, archives and educational and research institutions. National and Regional Group Report. https://aippi.soutron.net/Portal/Default/en-GB/RecordView/Index/1456

Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabinets. (2017, September). Konceptuālais ziņojums "Par intelektuālā īpašuma aizsardzības un pārvaldības sistēmu Latvijas Republikā [Conceptual report "on intellectual property protection and management system in the Republic of Latvia"]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/293578

Latvijas Republikas Saeima. (1998, October). Izglītības likums [Education law]. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/50759

Latvijas Republikas Saeima. (2000, May). Autortiesību likums [Copyright law]. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/5138

Matheson, S., Osha, J., Verschuur, A. M., Inui, Y., Laakkonen, A., & Nack, R. (2015). Study Question. Q246 “Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for libraries, archives and educational and research institutions”. International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property. https://aippi.soutron.net/Portal/Default/en-GB/RecordView/Index/1022

Satija, M. P. & Martínez-Ávila, D. (2019). Plagiarism an essay in terminology. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13937

Stewart, M. S. (1983). International copyright and neighbouring rights. Butterworths.

Torremans, P., & Holyoak, J. (1998). Intellectual property law. Butterworths.

Veiksa I., & Kisnica, I. (2016). Consumer friendly access to digital content by ensuring fair remuneration of creators: Latvia example. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 6(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2016.03.05

Veiksa, I., & Bordans, J. (2019). Critical review of the implementation of the EC Directive on Copyright in the Information Society (2001/29/EC) in Latvia. In B. Lindner, & T. Shapiro (Ed.), Copyright in the information society. A guide to national implementation of the European directive (2nd ed., pp. 535-562). Edward Elgar Publishing.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (1886, September). Berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698

World Intellectual Property Organization. (1996, December). Copyright treaty. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/295166

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Veikša, I. . (2026). Use of Copyrighted Works for Education and Research in EU Law. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 17(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.159.172