The Impact of Digital Technologies on Adolescents’ Learning Motivation in Latvia

Authors

  • Kristine Sile Business Administration Department, Turiba University, Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia
  • Daina Vasilevska Business Administration Department, Turiba University, Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.433.451

Keywords:

adolescents, digital competence, digital learning motivation, educational technologies

Abstract

Aim. The study aims to investigate the impact of digital technologies on adolescents’ learning motivation in Latvia, focusing on usage patterns, perceived benefits and drawbacks, and the role of teachers’ digital competence.

Methods. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was analysed was conducted in May 2025 with 477 students in grades 4–9 from Latvian general education schools. Data was collected via a 20-item questionnaire including dichotomous, multiple-choice, Likert-scale items, and open-ended questions. Quantitative data using descriptive statistics (percentages, distributions), while qualitative suggestions was thematically summarised.

Results. Digital technologies significantly enhance motivation, with 86.6% of students enjoying device-based learning and 85.1% having used artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Key benefits include increased engagement (19.3%), autonomy (16.9%), and easier comprehension (16.8%), while drawbacks involve eye strain (22.1%), internet disruptions (21.8%), and distractions (15.4%). Teachers’ digital skills were rated positively by 55.8%, though 53% believe improvements are needed.

Conclusions. The positive impact of digital technologies on learning motivation depends on teachers’ skills and the balanced, pedagogically grounded integration of technologies.

Practical application. Findings inform policy on teacher training, infrastructure investment, and digital well-being measures in Latvian schools, supporting School2030 initiatives.

Cognitive value. This is one of the first large-scale empirical studies in Latvia specifically examining adolescents’ perspectives on digital motivation in the post-COVID period, providing Baltic regional insights and student-driven recommendations for evidence-based digital education strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Kristine Sile, Business Administration Department, Turiba University, Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia

    Kristine Sile is a teacher and deputy director  at Sarkandaugava Primary School in Riga. She holds two master’s degrees:  a Master’s degree in Financial Management and a Master’s degree in Educational Leadership, which provide both strong management and analytical skills, as well as in-depth knowledge of educational theory and practice management. Her professional interests focus on inclusive education and promoting student motivation in a modern digital environment. She researches and practices teaching approaches adapted to students of different abilities and needs, as well as uses digital tools and methods to increase engagement, self-directed learning and motivation.
    At school, she implements lessons and initiatives that integrate pedagogical innovations with real classroom practice — paying special attention to differentiation, collaboration and the use of digital resources in the learning process. She regularly participates in professional development events and collaborative projects to promote the development of inclusive practice and share her experience with colleagues. She is also interested in research- and practice-based educational innovations that help create a learning environment in which every student feels supported, motivated, and able to develop their skills in the digital age.  

  • Daina Vasilevska, Business Administration Department, Turiba University, Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia

    Daina Vasilevska has a Dr.sc.admin. in educational management by the University of Latvia (2014) and is a visiting professor and researcher at the RTU Liepaja Academy. She is the author and co-author of more than 50 scientific publications and the author of three monographs. Since 2015, in collaboration with the Academy of Sciences of Latvia, she has participated in the implementation of ESF projects and National Research Program “Economic transformation, smart growth, governance and legal framework for sustainable development of the state and society - a new approach to the creation of a sustainable learning community ", “Challenges and solutions of Latvian state and society in an international framework". In 2018, in collaboration with the University of Latvia, she participated in the implementation of the project “Support for educational research” in Latvia (OECD TALIS). Through her participation in projects, she gained experience in collecting research data, evaluating test problems, and analysing test results. She teaches courses on educational management, innovation management, project management, quality management in educational institutions in bachelor's, master's and doctoral programs. Since 2016, more than 40 master's theses have been defended under her leadership.

References

Alberts, L., Lyngs, U., & Lukoff, K. (2024). Designing for sustained motivation: A review of self-determination theory in behaviour change technologies. Interacting with Computers, 38(3), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae040

Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031

Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to online learning: The mediating effect of autonomy support on engagement. Computers & Education, 183, Article 104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104495

Dauksiene, E., Trepule, E., & Volungeviciene, A. (2021). Digital competence improvement by Lithuanian school teachers during COVID-19. In EDEN Conference Proceedings (pp. 213–222). https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2021-ac0021

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Deemer, E.D., Barr, A.C., Belote, A., Hall, M. C., Xu, C., Ogas, J.P. (2023). Online science instruction can promote adolescents’ autonomy need satisfaction: A latent growth curve analysis. Research in Science Education, 53, 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10118-5

Ertan, E., & Kocadere, S. A. (2022). Gamification in online learning environments: A systematic review (2011–2021). Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1020044

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M.A., Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

He, J., Wang, Q., & Lee, H. (2025). Enhancing online learning engagement: Teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction and interaction. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 696. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03016-0

IT Izglītības fonds. (2025, April). Latvijas pedagogu digitālo prasmju pašnovērtējums. https://cilvecigipartehnologijam.lv/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PARSKATS_Latvijas-pedagogu-digitalo-prasmju-pasnovertejums.pdf

Li, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Gamification enhances student intrinsic motivation, perceptions of autonomy and relatedness, but minimal impact on competency: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10337-7

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

Nordregio. (2024). Monitoring digital inclusion in the Nordic and Baltic region (Discussion paper). Nordregio. https://nordregio.org/app//uploads/2024/01/monitoring-digital-inclusion-in-the-nordic-and-baltic-region.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Digitalizācija Latvijā [Digitalisation in Latvia]. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a58d1c1a-lv

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Impact of digital tools on student learning: Strong pedagogy, teacher training imperative. https://www.policyedge.in/p/oecd-report-reviews-impact-of-digital

Petrovica, S., Anohina-Naumeca, A. & Avanesova, J. (2022). The impact of digitalisation of higher education: The case of Latvia and Nordic-Baltic region. Applied Computer Systems, 27(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2022-0003

Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), Article ep280. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584

Seema, R., Heidmets, M., Valk, A., & Vainik, U. (2023). Students’ digital addiction and learning difficulties. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1191817. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1191817

Shank, E., Tang, H., & Morris, W. (2025). Motivation in online course design using self-determination theory: An action research study in a secondary mathematics course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10410-9

Smahel, D., Šaradín Lebedíková, M., Lacko, D., Kvardová, N., Mýlek, V., Tkaczyk, M., Švestková, A., Gulec, H., Hrdina, M., Macháčková, H., & Dědková, L. (2025). Tech & teens: Insights from 15 studies on the impact of digital technology on well-being. EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.g4asyqkcrum7

Stalmach, A., Reinck, C., D’Elia, P., Kucinschi, A., Scheiter, K., & Stürmer, K. (2025). A conceptual impact model of digital support for student self-regulation and emotion regulation grounded in self-determination theory. Discover Education, 4, Article 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00825-8

Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. (2021). Digitālās transformācijas pamatnostādnes 2021.–2027. gadam [Digital Transformation Guidelines 2021–2027]. https://www.varam.gov.lv/sites/varam/files/content/files/digitalas-transformacijas-pamatnostadnes-_2021-27.pdf

Topping, K., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), Article e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4020460?v=pdf

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2017). The state of the world’s children 2017: Children in a digital world. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/media/48581/file/SOWC_2017_ENG.pdf

Usca, S., Dzerviniks, J., Lubkina, V., Vindece, A., & Poplavskis, J. (2021). Development of teachers’ digital competence: Problems and solutions in Latvia. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 14, 327-333. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2021.14.036

Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, Article 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Sile, K., & Vasilevska, D. (2026). The Impact of Digital Technologies on Adolescents’ Learning Motivation in Latvia. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 17(1), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.433.451