Stimulating Young People's Interest in Education through Innovative Methods and Tools for Academic Interaction

Authors

  • Ihor Romanyshyn English Philology Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, vul. Shevchenko 57, 76018, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Oleh Konoshevskyi Department of Algebra and Mathematics Teaching Methods, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, vul. Ostroz'koho 32, 21100, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Oleksii Panasenko Department of Algebra and Mathematics Teaching Methods, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, vul. Ostroz'koho 32, 21100, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Ihor Kalashnikov Department of Algebra and Mathematics Teaching Methods, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, vul. Ostroz'koho 32, 21100, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Nataliia Dymar Department of Histology and Embryology, Bogomolets National Medical University, 13 Taras Shevchenko Blvd, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.631.652

Keywords:

autonomy, motivation, self-determination, sustainable development, university education, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation, transition economy

Abstract

Aim. The study addresses the urgent need to optimise motivational mechanisms in education to enhance student engagement and strengthen internal learning orientation. Motivated students typically demonstrate higher academic achievement and develop more sustainable lifelong learning competencies.

Methods. The research aims to systematise contemporary approaches to student motivation and propose recommendations for optimising the educational process in line with modern pedagogical practices. The methodology integrates qualitative and quantitative analyses. The qualitative component involves a synthesis of theoretical and empirical literature, applying methods of systematisation and generalisation. The quantitative component comprises a survey of 217 students using the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-C 28) to assess intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation.

Results. The findings reveal a high level of intrinsic motivation (M = 5.94), indicating strong intellectual engagement and self-determination (M = 5.55). Lower indices of extrinsic motivation (M = 4.93) and amotivation (M = 3.83) suggest reduced external dependency. Correlation analysis identified a strong positive relationship between achievement and stimulation subtypes (r = 0.821) and a strong negative correlation between amotivation and introjected regulation (r = –0.997). The study concludes that intrinsic motivation predominates, emphasising the need to promote autonomous learning and cognitive stimulation.

Conclusions. The research contributes to understanding motivational dynamics in education and provides practical directions for enhancing internal motivation amid digital transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akimova, N., Akimova, A., & Akimova, A. (2022). The study of the genesis of internet texts understanding in adolescence depending on the level of mental and speech development. Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2022-31-1-6-24

Ali, K. A. A. K., Sawalha, A. Z., & Odeh, A. (2022). Modern learning strategies used by teachers to increase students' motivation toward e-learning in many societies. In D. Burgos & S. Affouneh (Eds.), Radical solutions in Palestinian higher education: Research from An-Najah National University (pp. 53–65). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0101-0_5

Anghel, G. A. (2017). Modern teaching assessment and implications of learning motivation. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 9(1), 65–75.

Bakhov, I., Rudenko, Y., Dudnik, A., Dehtiarova, N., & Petrenko, S. (2021). Problems of teaching future teachers of humanities the basics of fuzzy logic and ways to overcome them. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13(2), 844–854. https://www.int-jecse.net/article/Problems+of+Teaching+Future+Teachers+of+Humanities+the+Basics+of+Fuzzy+Logic+and+Ways+to+Overcome+Them_283/?download=true&format=pdf

Bastos, O. A., Koshulko, V., & Čekerevac, Z. (2013). The decline of human capital in Ukrainian education and science: Experience of reversal. MEST Journal, 1(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.12709/mest.01.01.02.10

Bodnar, A., & Rybalochka, K. (2021). Osoblyvosti profesiynoho samovyznachennya suchasnykh studentiv [Features of professional self-determination of modern students]. Psykholohiya ta Psykhosotsialʹni Interventsiyi, 3, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2348.2020.3.3-10

Bornman, M., & Soobramoney, J. (2024). Assessing student motivation in an involuntary online learning environment. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.70875/v8i2article10

Cherkezova, S. G. (2024). Students' mastery goal orientation, academic achievement and education-to-employment transition attitudes: Evidence from 30 countries. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(5), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2313

Dobrovolska, A. (2024). Professional self-determination of future doctors: Priorities in conditions of the war in Ukraine. Wiadomości Lekarskie Medical Advances, 77(4), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202404129

Fisher, D. P., Brotto, G., Lim, I., & Southam, C. (2025). The impact of timely formative feedback on university student motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 622-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2449891

Fujii, A. (2024). Exploring autonomy support and learning preference in higher education: Introducing a flexible and personalized learning environment with technology. Discover Education, 3, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00111-z

Hasibuan, N. K., Yeli, S., & Zaitun, Z. (2025). The influence of differentiated learning methods on student motivation and learning outcomes. Jurnal Inovatif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.38073/jimpi.v4i1.1909

Husnutdinov, A. N., & Gilmanov, M. M. (2024). Modern teaching methods in the context of innovations and quality education. Economics and Upgrading: Problemy, Rešeniâ, 7/5(148), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.07.05.008

Jain, M. B., & Roy, S. K. (2022). Student motivation in online learning. International Journal of Early Childhood, 1, 4339-4346.

Keramati, A., Keramati, M. R., & Arefian, M. H. (2024). Students' reflection on the effect of collaborative learning on the learning environment and academic achievement in online reflective platforms. Reflective Practice, 25(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2305868

Kunicina, N., Čaiko, J., & Grants, R. (2023). Enhancing student motivation and academic success: Effective strategies for promoting study programs in education. In 2023 IEEE 64th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/RTUCON60080.2023.10413029

Lavryniuk, O., & Kyrychenko, V. (2023). Motyvatsiya do navchalʹnoyi diyalʹnosti: Analiz suchasnykh teoriy [Motivation for learning activities: An analysis of modern theories]. Zhurnal Sotsialʹnoyi ta Praktychnoyi Psykholohiyi, 1, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-2023-1-6

Lei, Y. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of STEM success: Exploring the interplay of motivation to learn science, self-regulation, and emotional intelligence from a perspective of self-determination theory. Learning and Motivation, 87, Article 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102012

Lin, H., & Ayob, A. (2024). Influence of pedagogy support on learning motivation for college student in Inner Mongolia, China. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(5), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i5.11.2024

Mahmudulhassan, Abuzar, M., Khondoker, S. U. A., & Rahman, O. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of student motivation and behavior: A qualitative analysis of influencing factors and effective interventions. Solo Universal Journal of Islamic Education and Multiculturalism, 2(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.61455/sujiem.v2i03.202

Makedon, V., Myachin, V., Kuriacha, N., Chaika, Y., & Koptilyi, D. (2025). Development of strategic management of a corporation through the implementation of scenario analysis. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series "Economics", 12(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ2.2025.135

Makedon, V., Myachin, V., Plakhotnik, O., Fisunenko, N., & Mykhailenko, O. (2024). Construction of a model for evaluating the efficiency of technology transfer process based on a fuzzy logic approach. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13(128)), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300796

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Semenets-Orlova, I., Klochko, A., Tereshchuk, O., Denisova, L., Nestor, V., & Sadovyi, S. (2022). Special aspects of educational managers' administrative activity under conditions of distance learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p286

Starosta, V. (2024). Navchannya studentiv ta aspirantiv do i pid chas uskladnenykh umov (pandemiya Covid-19, voyennyy stan v Ukrayini) [Learning motivation of higher education and PhD students before and during complicated conditions (pandemic COVID-19, martial law in Ukraine)]. Naukovyy Zhurnal Khortytsʹkoyi Natsionalʹnoyi Akademiyi, 11, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.51706/2707-3076-2024-11-1

Tomar, S., Arundhathi, A., Gupta, S., & Sharma, M. (2024). Digital assessment: Impact on student motivation, peer learning, group dynamics. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.21138

Tymoshenko, N., Osypenko, O., Smolinska, O., Ilina, O., & Romaniuk, A. (2024). Integrating gamification and gaming technologies into Ukrainian education: Transforming the learning experience. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, Article 2024ss0725. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0725

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, É. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M., & Loyens, S. M. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students' motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Yue, S. (2024). The evolution of pedagogical theory: From traditional to modern approaches and their impact on student engagement and success. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(3), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.54097/j4agx439

Zhang, B. (2023). Causes and improvement strategies of students' "pretending to study" phenomenon. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 20, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v20i.11687

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Romanyshyn, I. ., Konoshevskyi, O. ., Panasenko, O. ., Kalashnikov, I., & Dymar, N. . (2026). Stimulating Young People’s Interest in Education through Innovative Methods and Tools for Academic Interaction. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 17(1), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.631.652