What does the Visual Image of a Teacher Have to do with the Prestige of the Teaching Profession? Some Research Experience on this Issue in Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.49.71Keywords:
teacher, image of the teacher, occupational prestige, visual communicationAbstract
Aim. Our study explores how 14-15-year-olds in Latvia perceive the visual image of the teacher, highlighting contribution of visual communication to the prestige of the teaching profession. Our research poses two questions: (RQ1) Which indicators of occupational prestige are attributable to teacher’s visual image? (RQ2) How do pupils evaluate a teacher’s image based on these indicators, and what does this reveal about their expectations for visual communication with teachers?
Methods. We conducted a qualitative study analysing the responses of 290 Latvian adolescents aged 14-15 to the question, “What does a typical teacher look like?” The analysis focused on four components related to the visual image of a teacher that reflect indicators of occupational prestige: gender, age, physical appearance, verbal communication (e.g., tone of voice), and non-verbal communication.
Results. Pupils generally viewed teaching as a female-dominated profession, associating women teachers with kindness and care, and men with greater strictness. Age stereotypes were strong: teachers were often seen as “old,” with older staff described as strict, tired, or outdated, while younger teachers were valued for their energy, friendliness, and approachability. Pupils paid close attention to teachers’ communication styles, appreciating smiling, joking, and calmness, but criticising shouting, anger, and visible fatigue; they respected both cheerfulness and professional seriousness. In terms of appearance, neatness and modesty were preferred, and female teachers expected to be well-groomed but not sexualized.
Conclusions. Pupils' responses highlight areas where visual communication can be improved: the findings indicate that respondents expect teachers to appear at least morally – if not physically – youthful, maintain a neat and discreet appearance, communicate in a cheerful manner, and avoid raising their voice to a shout.
Originality. Although extensive research has explored both the image of teacher and the prestige of the teaching profession, the relationship between these two phenomena has received only limited attention. Our study reveals that a teacher’s professional prestige contains indicators influenced by the teachers themselves: specifically, our findings highlight elements of visual communication that educators can critically assess to enhance the prestige of their profession.
Downloads
References
Bolotin, J. P. (2001). The ideal teacher: Images in early 20th-century teacher education textbooks. In P. Bolotin Joseph, & G. E. Burnaford (Eds.), Images of schoolteachers in America (pp. 135–157). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bombi, S. A, Cannoni, E., Gallì, F., & Di Norcia, A. (2021). Children’s pictorial representation of their interactions with teachers. Psicologia Educativa, 27(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2020a14
Burke, P. (2001). Eyewitnessing. The use of images as historical evidence. Cornell University Press.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotyped images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist-test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.
Çiydem, E. (2023). Policies and practices for the professionalization of the teaching profession in the Late Ottoman Empire (1839–1920). Paedagogica Historica, 59(5), 904–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2021.1983620
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Klein, S. P. (1995). A license to teach: Building a profession for 21st-century schools. Westview Press.
Davey, N. (1999). The hermeneutics of seeing. In Heywood, I., & Sandywell, B. (Eds.), Interpreting visual culture: Explorations in the hermeneutics of the visual (pp. 3–29). Routledge.
Depaepe, M. (2000). Demythologizing the educational past. The endless task of history of education. In R. Lowe (Ed.), History of education: Major themes. Vol. I: Debates in the history of education (pp. 356–370). Routledge.
Depaepe, M., Lauwers, H., & Simon, F. (2006). The feminization of the teaching profession in Belgium in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.” In R. Cortina & S. San Román (Eds.), Women and teaching (pp. 155–183). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403984371_7
European Commission’s Directorate-General for Education. (2023). Education and training monitor 2023. Latvia. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fisher, R., Harris, A., & Jarvis, C. (2008). Education in popular culture. Telling tales on teacher and learners. Routledge.
Fried, L., Mansfield, C., & Dobozy, E. (2015). Teacher emotion research: Introducing a conceptual model to guide future research. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 415–441.
Garai, I., & Németh, A. (2017). ‘I am alone. Only the truth stands behind me’: An interpretation of the life of an elementary teacher. In C. Yanes-Cabrera, J. Meda, & A. Viñao (Eds.) School memories. New trends in the history of education (pp. 129–141). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Gasparini, F., & Vick, M. (2006). Picturing the history of teacher education: Photographs and methodology.” History of Educational Review, 35(2), 16–31.
Harrison, J. L., Clarke, L., & Ungerer, J. A. (2007). Children’s drawings provide a new perspective on teacher–child relationship quality and school adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.10.003
Hirschman, E. C., & Brunswick, N. (2002). Hair as attribute, hair as symbol, hair as self. Gender and Consumer Behaviour, 6, 355–366.
Kaļķe, B. (2012). The visual image of the teacher in Latvia. In I. Kestere, C. Wolhuter, & R. Lozano (Eds.), The visual image of the teacher: International comparative perspectives (pp. 106–125). RaKa.
Kantor, K., Kantor, N. L., Kantor, J., Eaton, M., & Kantor, B. (2001). ‘I will not expose the ignorance of the faculty’: The Simpsons as school satire. In P. Bolotin Joseph & G. E. Burnaford (Eds.). Images of schoolteachers in America (2nd ed., pp. 185–200). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Kestere, I., & Kaļķe, B. (2015). The visual image of the teachers: A ten-country perspective. Revista Columbiana de Educación, 68, 19–40.
Kestere, I., & Kaļķe, B. (2021). ‘Solemn as the Kremlin’? Emotions of teachers in Soviet classroom photos. In F. C. Rubí, K. Priem & S. González Gómez (Eds.), Media matter: Images as presenters, mediators, and means of observation (pp. 29–48). De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110696905-003
Kestere, I., Wolhuter, C., & Lozano, R. (Eds.) (2012). The visual image of the teacher: International comparative perspectives. RaKa.
Lee, S. Y., & Winandy, J. (2023). Scientization of professional teacher knowledges and construction of teaching methods.” Paedagogica Historica, 59(5), 958–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2021.1983621
Levine, M. P., & Smolak, L. (2002). Body image development in adolescence. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 74 –82). Guilford Press.
Lhommet, M., & Marsella, S. C. (2014). Expressing emotion through posture and gesture. In R. Calvo, S. D’Mello, J. Gratch, & A. Kappas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of affective computing (pp. 273–285). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199942237.013.039
LIZDA. (2016). Skolotāja profesijas prestižs Latvijā. Pārskats par LIZDA Interneta aptaujas rezultātiem [The prestige of the teaching profession in Latvia. Overview of the results of the LIZDA internet survey]. https://www.lizda.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Skolotaju-prestizs.pdf
LIZDA. (2024). Politikas ieteikumi atbalsta sistēmai jaunajiem pedagogiem vietējā, valsts un ES līmenī [Policy recommendations for a support system for young teachers at local, national, and EU level]. https://www.lizda.lv/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Policy-recommendations-LV.pdf
Longobardi, C., Pasta, T., Gastaldi, F. G. M., & Prino, L. E. (2017). Measuring the student-teacher relationship using children’s drawings in an Italian elementary school. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research – JPER, 25(1), 115–129.
Manke, M. P. (1997). Classroom power relations: Understanding student-teacher interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Manning, J. (2011). The sociology of hair: Hair symbolism among college students.” Social Science Journal,10(1), 35–48.
Marshall, J. (2007). Image as insight: Visual images in practice-based research. Studies in Art Education. A Journal of Issues and Research, 49(1), 23–41.
Martikainen, J. (2019). Social representations of teachership based on students’ and teachers’ drawings of a typical teacher. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09490-w
McGrath, K. F., Van Bergen, P., & Sweller, N. (2017). Adding colour to conflict.” The Elementary School Journal, 117(4), 642–663.
Misāne, G., Gurbo, M., Jemeljanova, M., & Dedze, I. (2007). Pētījums par pedagogu profesijas prestižu un iespējām to paaugstināt dažādu mērķauditoriju skatījumā [Study on the prestige of the teaching profession and the opportunities for raising it among different target audiences]. SIA Invite Konsultācijas.
Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (1999). Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. Falmer Press.
Monteiro, A. R. (2015). The teaching profession. Present and future. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12130-7
Nagy, P. (2019). History of emotions. In M. Tamm & P. Burke (Eds.), Debating new approaches to history (pp. 189–215). Bloomsbury Academic.
Niikko, A. (2020). Examining images of teacher students. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(6), 884–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1836587
Nóvoa, A. (2000). Ways of saying, ways of seeing: Public images of teachers (19th–20th centuries). Paedagogica Historica, 36(1), 21–52.
Official Statistics of Latvia. (2023). Gender equality: Education and science. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/indicators-well-being-and-equality/gender-equality/6301-gender-equality-education
Polat, S. (2023). Evaluation of image studies in the field of education: A systematic literature review. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 8(3), 676–724. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1248610
Reay, D. (2001). The paradox of contemporary femininities in education: Combining fluidity with fixity.” In B. Francis & C. Skelton (Eds.), Investigating gender: Contemporary perspectives in education (pp. 152–165). Open University Press.
Rutka, L. (2012). Pedagoga psiholoģiskā kompetence [Psychological competence of a teacher]. RaKa.
Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.) (2007). Emotion in education. Academic Press.
Schutz, P. A. (2014). Inquiry on teachers’ emotion. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.864955
Smak, M., & Walczak, D. (2017). The prestige of the teaching profession in the perception of teachers and former teachers.” Edukacja: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 22–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24131/3724.170502
Tröhler, D. (2016). The paradox of being a teacher: Institutionalized relevance and organized mistrust.” In P. Siljander, K. Kontio, & E. Pikkarainen (Eds.), Schools in transition. Linking past, present, and future in educational practice (pp. 79–96). Sense Publishers.
Vick, M. (2000). What does teacher look like? Paedagogica Historica, 36(1), 248–263.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). That’s funny you don’t look like a teacher: Interrogating images and identity in popular culture. The Falmer Press.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 213–238.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iveta Kestere, Baiba Kalke, Edgars Berzins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
