Is STEM Education Gender Neutral? An Analysis of Teachers’ Perceptions of Gender Differences in Five Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.73.86Keywords:
STEM, gender equality, gender stereotypes, inclusive education, educational policyAbstract
Thesis. The authors investigate the extent to which STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education is perceived as gender-neutral by educators across Europe, with a focus on how these perceptions influence student engagement and the perpetuation of gender gaps.
Methods. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative survey data from 167 teachers in Germany, Poland, Romania, Türkiye, and Portugal with qualitative insights from focus group interviews. The study aimed to assess educators’ awareness of gender imbalances in STEM fields, their attitudes toward inclusivity, and the pedagogical practices they adopt in response to perceived disparities.
Results. Findings indicate that while a majority of teachers acknowledge the existence of gender disparities in STEM education, their interpretations and proposed responses differ significantly. Some educators minimise the issue, while others emphasise its systemic nature.
Conclusion. The results point to a lack of unified understanding and underscore the urgent need for professional development focused on gender-sensitive teaching strategies. The conclusion emphasises the pivotal role teachers play in either challenging or reinforcing stereotypes and highlights the necessity of integrating gender awareness into teacher training programs.
Originality. This research offers a cross-national perspective on teachers’ perceptions of gender in STEM, contributing valuable insights into the social dynamics shaping educational equity.
Downloads
References
Avolio, B., Chávez, J., & Vílchez-Román, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 773–794.
Campbell, C., Hobbs, L., Xu, L., McKinnon, J., & Speldewinde, C. (2022). Girls in STEM: Addressing SDG 4 in Context. Sustainability, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094897
Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23.
Chen, S. Y., Tsai, J. C., Liu, S. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). The effect of a scientific board game on improving creative problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100921
Dahn, M., & DeLiema, D. (2020). Dynamics of Emotion, Problem Solving, and Identity: Portraits of Three Girl Coders. Computer Science Education, 30(3), 362–389.
Dierickx, E., Luyckx, K., & Ardies, J. (2022). Are my technology lessons for girls? The Gender Sensitive Education Checklist (GSEC) for teaching science and technology. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 27(2), 24–37.
Dhiman, B. (2023). Education's role in empowering women and promoting gender inequality: A critical review. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24329284.v1
English, L. D. (2015). STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. In T. Muir, J. Wells & K. Beswick (Eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Vol. 1 (pp. 4-18). PME.
Ertl, B., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2017). The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703
European Commission (2021). She Figures 2021: Gender in research and innovation: Statistics and indicators. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2777/06090
González-Pérez, S., Mateos de Cabo, R., & Sáinz, M. (2020). Girls in STEM: Is it a female role-model thing? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02204
Harrison, L., Hurd, E., & Brinegar, K. (2020). Equity and access to STEM education. Middle School Journal, 51(3), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2020.1735847
King, R. B. (2016). Gender differences in motivation, engagement, and achievement are related to students' perceptions of peer—but not of parent or teacher—attitudes toward school. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.006
Leal Filho, W., Kovaleva, M., Tsani, S., Țîrcă, D. M., Shiel, C., Dinis, M. A. P., Nicolau, M., Sima, M., Fritzen, B., Salvia, A. L., Minhas, A., Kozlova, V., Doni, F., Spiteri, J., Gupta, T., Wakunuma, K., Sharma, M., Barbir, J., Shulla, K., Bhandari, M. P., Tripathi, S. (2023). Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 25, 14177–14198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02656-1
McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
McLean, L. B. (2024). STEM for all: How to connect, create, and cultivate STEM education for all learners. Wiley.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en.
Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Freeman, J. L., Pituch, K. A., & Vasquez, A. C. (2018). Gender disparities in students’ motivational experiences in high school science classrooms. Science Education, 102(5), 951–977. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/sce.21461
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021). Men, women, and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 3–39. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0890207020962326
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Tabassum, N., & Nayak, B. S. (2021). Gender Stereotypes and Their Impact on Women’s Career Progressions from a Managerial Perspective. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 10(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024: Gender report: Technology on her terms. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389406
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020. World Economic Forum https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Remigiusz Mazur, Ludmiła Walaszczyk, Rodica-Cristina Apostolatu, Marc Beutner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
