The Role of Teacher Feedback in Competency-Based Education: Monitoring Students' Personal Progress and Goal Setting

Authors

  • Jovita Ponomariovienė Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, T. Ševčenkos g. 31, Vilnius, 03113 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Daiva Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, T. Ševčenkos g. 31, Vilnius, 03113 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Frédéric Torterat Faculty of Education, University of Montpellier, 2, Place Marcel Godechot 34092 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.383.414

Keywords:

competency-based education, formative feedback, learning goals, primary school students, student engagement, motivation

Abstract

Aim. This study aims to explore the role of teacher feedback in competency-based education, focusing on how it supports students in setting learning goals, engaging in reflection, and sustaining their learning processes.

Methods. The research was conducted in two Lithuanian schools and involved six primary school teachers and 108 fourth-grade students. Data collection methods included the analysis of students’ goal-setting notebooks, semi-structured interviews with teachers, and focus group discussions with students.

Results. The findings indicate that structured and timely feedback significantly enhances students’ motivation to set learning goals and engage in reflective practices. Students who consistently received personalised feedback demonstrated a stronger capacity to track their learning progress and maintain engagement in the learning process. Additionally, parental involvement was identified as a significant factor reinforcing students’ motivation and independence in monitoring their progress.

Conclusion. The study highlights the crucial role of teacher support in fostering students' autonomy in goal-setting, analysing, and reflecting on their learning. Formative feedback emerges as a key mechanism for promoting motivation, deeper cognitive involvement, and the ability to sustain progress in a competency-based learning environment. Future research should investigate effective formative feedback strategies across diverse educational contexts, including the potential of digital tools to strengthen reflective learning practices.

Research restrictions. The study was limited to two schools and fourth-grade students, which may affect the generalisability of the findings to other educational levels and contexts.

Cognitive value. This study is significant as it reveals how purposeful and personalized teacher feedback can substantially strengthen students’ motivation, goal-setting, and reflection. These insights provide practical value for both teachers and school leaders aiming to improve the quality of education and implement the principles of competency-based learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Jovita Ponomariovienė, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, T. Ševčenkos g. 31, Vilnius, 03113 Vilnius, Lithuania

    PhD student in Education at the Academy of Education, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania. Director of the Department of Education at the National Education Agency, involved in national and international research initiatives, including Erasmus+ projects. Author of 12 exercise books for preschool and primary school students. Research interests focus on competency-based education at the elementary level in both public and private schools, quality of educational practice, and innovative didactics.

  • Daiva Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, T. Ševčenkos g. 31, Vilnius, 03113 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Professor, Head of the Didactics Research Cluster, Academy of Education, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania. European Commission Inspector of Pre-school and Primary Education in European Schools, Representative of Lithuania. Daiva Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė is author of more than 50 scientific publications, including articles, books, chapters, co-author of Lithuanian language and literature books for primary school pupils. Research interests include: Curriculum theory, pedagogy, general didactics, didactics of elementary language arts education, integrated didactics of languages, Cooperative learning, Assessment of students’ learning and progress, teacher leadership that transforms educational practice.

  • Frédéric Torterat, Faculty of Education, University of Montpellier, 2, Place Marcel Godechot 34092 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    Professor works at the University of Montpellier within the Faculty of Education, in the LIRDEF – Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Didactics, Education and Training, where he serves as Deputy Director. His research interests include grammar and linguistic typology, language acquisition processes, and the socio-discursive analysis of early childhood socialization. He is actively involved in European projects such as CONCRETE (implemented in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Norway, Bosnia, and France). In addition, he is the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Éducation & Socialisation.

References

Aeppli, J., & Lötscher, H. (2016). EDAMA - Ein Rahmenmodell für Reflexion. Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und Lehrerbildung, 34(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:13921

Allen, N. (2016). La prise de notes: Une stratégie répandue en situation pédagogique de compréhension orale. Repères, 54, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.4000/reperes.1081

Alt, D., Naamati-Schneider, L., & Weishut, D. J. N. (2023). Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, 48(12), 1901–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203

Anderson, J. (2020). Reflection. ELT Journal, 74(4), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa039

Bader, M., Hoem Iversen, S., & Borg, S. (2024). Student teachers’ reactions to formative teacher and peer feedback. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2385717

Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008

Baßeng, G., & Budke, A. (2024). Game on, reflection on: Reflection diaries as a tool for promoting reflection skills in geography lessons. Education Sciences, 14, Article 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030316

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Brochu, D., & Villemure, É. (2022). L’apprentissage en profondeur: une voie prometteuse pour développer les compétences du 21e siècle à l’école St-Vincent. Revue Hybride de l’Education, 6(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1522/rhe.v6i1.1230

Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Bubnys, R. (2019). A journey of self-reflection in students’ perception of practice and roles in the profession. Sustainability, 11(1), Article 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010194

Budworth, M., Latham, G. P., & Manroop, L. (2015). Looking forward to performance improvement: A field test of the feedforward interview for performance management. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 45–54. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/hrm.21618

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: Exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351

Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765

Chou, C.-Y., & Zou, N.-B. (2020). An analysis of internal and external feedback in self-regulated learning activities mediated by self-regulated learning tools and open learner models. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00233-y

Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Roher Murphy, L. C. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319855

Colomer, J., Serra, L., Cañabate, D., & Serra, T. (2018). Evaluating knowledge and assessment-centered reflective-based learning approaches. Sustainability, 10(9), Article 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093122

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Dann, R. (2019). Feedback as a relational concept in the classroom. Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1636839

Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2018). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877

Deeley, S. J. (2018). Using technology to facilitate effective assessment for learning and feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356906

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning – Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

Ding, N. (2025). Analysis of the role of teacher feedback in students’ cognitive engagement. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 18(1), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.54097/6qe8s854

Eriksson, E. (2021). Constructing clarity – Swedish teachers’ and students’ shared concern in feedback interaction in primary school classrooms. Education 3-13, 51(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1948090

Eriksson, E., Boistrup L. B., & Thornberg, R. (2018). A qualitative study of primary teachers’ classroom feedback rationales. Educational Research, 60(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1451759

Eriksson, E., Boistrup, L. B., & Thornberg, R. (2020b). “You must learn something during a lesson”: How primary students construct meaning from teacher feedback. Educational Studies, 48(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1753177

Escorcia, D. & Fenouillet, F. (2018). Connaissances métacognitives et stratégies d’autorégulation impliquées dans la révision de textes: Construction et validation d’un instrument autorapporté. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 41(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1059171ar

Frattarola, A., Leong, A. P., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2024). Designing curriculum for student feedback literacy: Student appreciation for and engagement with teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241269632

Gaitas, S., Martins, M., & Fijalkow, J. (2017). Effective literacy teaching practices in Portugal: A study in first grade. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2017.17.01.03

Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Students’ perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20(2), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212

Ghezir, S., Naimie, Z., Leng, C. H., Shagholi, R., & Abuzaid, R. A. (2021). Review study: Competency-based approach implementation in educational system. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v8i2.6156

Guce, I. K. (2017). Investigating college students’ views on mathematics learning through reflective journal writing. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i1.6345

Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Science of Learning, 1, Article 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Holmes, A. G. D., Polman Tuin, M., & Turner, S. L. (2021). Competence and competency in higher education, simple terms yet with complex meanings: Theoretical and practical issues for university teachers and assessors implementing Competency-Based Education (CBE). Educational Process International Journal, 10(3), 39–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.103.3

Irwin, P., & Coutts, R. (2017). Learning through reflection. SPROUT: A schema to Teach Reflective practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(36). http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10938.85444

Jeong, Y. H., Healy, L. C., & McEwan, D. (2023). The application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1901298

Ketonen, L., & Nieminen, J. H. (2023). Supporting student teachers’ reflection through assessment: The case of reflective podcasts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, Article 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104039

King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE.

Koch, T., & Kralik, D. (2006). Participatory action research in health care. Wiley-Blackwell.

Kulgemeyer, Ch., Kempin, M., Weißbach, A., Borowski, A., Buschhüter, D., Enkrott, P., Reinhold, P., Riese, J., Schecker, H., Schröder, J. & Vogelsang, Ch. (2021). Exploring the impact of pre-service science teachers’ reflection skills on the development of professional knowledge during a field experience. International Journal of Science Education, 43(18), 3035–3057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2006820

Kumps, A., Temperman, G., & De Lièvre, B. (2022). Développer des compétences réceptives en langue maternelle à partir de cercles collaboratifs d’écoute. Les Dossiers des Sciences de L’éducation, 43, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.4488

Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383

Lefebvre, J., Lefebvre, H., Gauvin-Lepage, J., Gosselin, R., & Lecocq, D. (2023). Reflection on teaching action and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134, Article 104305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104305

Liebenow, L. W., Schmidt, F., Meyer, J., Panadero, E., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Supporting self-assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of feedback effects. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/k94eq

Lipnevich, A. A., D. Berg, & J. K. Smith. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown & L. Harris (Eds.), Human factors and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Routledge.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127

Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7

Luckett, K., & Sutherland, L. (2000). Assessment practices that improve teaching and learning. In S. Makoni (Ed.), Improving teaching and learning in higher education: A handbook for Southern Africa (pp. 98–130). Witwatersrand University.

McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.868878

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955

Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633-653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45201203

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nicol, D., & McCallum, R. (2021). Making internal feedback explicit: Exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review to develop students’ evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 756–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Ozan, C., & Kincal, R. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 18(1), 85-118.

Panadero, E., Fernández, J., Pinedo, L., Sánchez, I., & García-Pérez, D. (2024). A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): Secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 31(3–4), 221–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2367027

Pardo, A. (2017). A feedback model for data-rich learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1356905

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.

Pitt, E., Bearman, M., & Esterhazy, R. (2020). The conundrum of low achievement and feedback for learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1630363

Ponomariovienė, J., Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., & Torterat, F. (2025). Implementing competency-based education through the personalized monitoring of primary students’ progress and assessment. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020252

Putwain, D. W., Symes, W., Nicholson, L. J., & Becker, S. (2018). Achievement goals, behavioural engagement, and mathematics achievement: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.006

Quigley, M., & Whitt, E. (2024). Perfect assessment and feedback in psychology: Students’ perspectives. PRHE Journal Online First, 113-125

Rønsen, A. K. (2013). What teachers say and what students perceive – Interpretations of feedback in teacher-student assessment dialogues. Education Inquiry, 4(3), Article 22625. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22625

Ropohl, M., & Rönnebeck, S. (2019). Making learning effective – quantity and quality of pre-service teachers’ feedback. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2156–2176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663452

Rowe, D. A., Mazzotti, V. L., Ingram, A., & Lee, S. (2016). Effects of Goal-Setting instruction on academic engagement for students at risk. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416678175

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Min, L. (2013). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 215–232). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649

Sanchez-Gil-Machín, R., Baena Morales, S., Molina-García, N., & Ferriz-Valero, A. (2025). Impact of feedback in flipped learning on the development of soft skills of university students. Education Sciences, 15(1), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010063

Sandal, A. K., Helleve, I., Smith, K., & Gamlem, S. M. (2022). Feedback practice in lower secondary school: Exploring development of perceptions of feedback practice among students and teachers. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2101236. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2101236

Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Jovanović, J., & Gašević, D. (2023). Intense, turbulent, or wallowing in the mire: A longitudinal study of cross-course online tactics, strategies, and trajectories. The Internet and Higher Education, 57, Article 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100902

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Sides, J. D., & Cuevas, J. A. (2020). Effect of goal setting for motivation, self-efficacy, and performance in elementary mathematics. International Journal Of Instruction, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1341a

Snowball, J., & Sayigh, E. (2007). Using the tutorial system to improve the quality of feedback to students in large class teaching. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(2), 321–333. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC37323

Soucy, E. (2019). Creation et mise en pratique d’un centre de l’oral: Recherche-action avec desenseignantes de 1er cycle du primaire [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universite du Quebec en Outaouais, Saint-Jerôme.

Soucy, E., Dumais, C., & Moreau, A. C. (2020). Quand la recherche-action au doctorat devient possible: Place à l’artisan-chercheur. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 11(2), 7–12.

Tay, H. Y., & Lam, K. W. L. (2022). Students’ engagement across a typology of teacher feedback practices. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 21(3) 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09315-2

Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.006

Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Wijnia, L., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M. J., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2018). Is problem-based learning associated with students’ motivation? A quantitative and qualitative study. Learning Environments Research, 21(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9246-9

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Winstone, N. E., & Boud, B. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1664–1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Ponomariovienė, J. ., Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D., & Torterat, F. (2025). The Role of Teacher Feedback in Competency-Based Education: Monitoring Students’ Personal Progress and Goal Setting. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 16(2), 383-414. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.383.414