Development of Online Video-Based Learning Media as an Alternative for Accounting Education, A Conceptual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.461.482Keywords:
learning videos, online learning, accounting education, educational technology, student engagementAbstract
Aim. This literature review explores the development of video-based learning media as an alternative to accounting learning through online communication. In the digital era, the use of technology in education is becoming increasingly important, especially when face-to-face learning is not possible. Video-based learning media offer greater flexibility and accessibility, allowing students to learn at their own pace and time.
Methods. This study method involves the analysis of various academic sources about the use of video and technology in accounting learning.
Results. The results show that video-based learning can improve concept understanding, student engagement, and learning outcomes. Learning videos also allow for a more interactive and engaging presentation of material that can be accessed anytime. Challenges in implementation include the need for technological skills and the quality of infrastructure. Providing sufficient training and technical support and designing videos that align with the curriculum is crucial to address these challenges.
Conclusion. This study concludes that online video-based learning media is a viable and effective alternative for accounting education when executed with careful planning and implementation.
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), Article e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Abu Talib, M., Bettayeb, A. M., & Omer, R. I. (2021). Analytical study on the impact of technology in higher education during the age of COVID-19: Systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6719-6746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-1
Al-Htaybat, K., von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L., & Alhatabat, Z. (2018). Educating digital natives for the future: accounting educators' evaluation of the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education, 27(4), 333-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1437758
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2016). Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1663-1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9407-3
Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners' motivation in distance Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3247-3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5
Bati, T. B., & Workneh, A. W. (2021). Evaluating integrated use of information technologies in secondary schools of Ethiopia using design‐reality gap analysis: A school‐level study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(1), Article e12148. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12148
Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors' views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009
Butcher, J., & Rose-Adams, J. (2015). Part-time learners in open and distance learning: Revisiting the critical importance of choice, flexibility and employability. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1055719
Callimaci, A., & Fortin, A. (2023). The impact of teacher video presence on student performance and satisfaction in undergraduate accounting courses. Accounting Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2023.2257676
Carenys, J., & Moya, S. (2016). Digital game-based learning in accounting and business education. Accounting Education, 25(6), 598-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1241951
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565-3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2523-2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Cavus, N. (2013). Selecting a learning management system (LMS) in developing countries: instructors' evaluation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(5), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.584321
Chambers, D., & Varoglu, Z. (2023). Learning for all: Guidelines on the inclusion of learners with disabilities in open and distance learning (ODL). UNESCO Publishing.
Dahleez, K. A., El-Saleh, A. A., Al Alawi, A. M., & Abdel Fattah, F. A. M. (2021). Student learning outcomes and online engagement in time of crisis: The role of e-learning system usability and teacher behavior. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(5), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2021-0057
De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.007
Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
Evans, M. P. (2015). Educating preservice teachers for family, school, and community engagement. In R. Quezada, V. Alexandrowicz, & S. Molina (Eds.), Family, school, community engagement and partnerships (pp. 9-19). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713687
Forde, C., & OBrien, A. (2022). A literature review of barriers and opportunities presented by digitally enhanced practical skill teaching and learning in health science education. Medical Education Online, 27(1), Article 2068210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2068210
Gaible, E., & Burns, M. (2005). Using technology to train teachers: Appropriate uses of ICT for teacher professional development in developing countries. infoDev / World Bank. http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
Hershkovitz, A., Daniel, E., Klein, Y., & Shacham, M. (2023). Technology integration in emergency remote teaching: teachers' self-efficacy and sense of success. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12433-12464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11688-7
Hofer, S. I., Nistor, N., & Scheibenzuber, C. (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789
Hung, I.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). Embodied interactive video lectures for improving learning comprehension and retention. Computers & Education, 117, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.005
Jaggars, S. S., Motz, B. A., Rivera, M. D., Heckler, A., Quick, J. D., Hance, E. A., & Karwisch, C. (2021). The digital divide among college students: lessons learned from the COVID-19 emergency transition. Midwestern Higher Education Compact. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611284.pdf
James, W., Oates, G., & Schonfeldt, N. (2024). Improving retention while enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes using gamified mobile technology. Accounting Education, 34(3), 366-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326009
Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467-483. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ855000.pdf
Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. G., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500
Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
Khan, M. A., & Law, L. S. (2015). An Integrative approach to curriculum development in higher education in the USA: A theoretical framework. International Education Studies, 8(3), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p66
Knight, A. M., Carrese, J. A., & Wright, S. M. (2007). Qualitative assessment of the long-term impact of a faculty development programme in teaching skills. Medical Education, 41(6), 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02770.x
Kong, S.-C. (2018). Parents' perceptions of e-learning in school education: implications for the partnership between schools and parents. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1317659
Lang, F., Gerhäuser, A., Wild, C., Wennberg, E., Schmidt, M., Wagner, M., Müller-Stich, B., & Nickel, F. (2023). Video-based learning of coping strategies for common errors improves laparoscopy training—a randomized study. Surgical Endoscopy, 37, 4054-4064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09969-w
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers' adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Lin, L.-C., Hung, I.-C., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2019). The impact of student engagement on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1573-1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9
Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2014). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321-334). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877258
Muir, T., Wang, I., Trimble, A., Mainsbridge, C., & Douglas, T. (2022). Using interactive online pedagogical approaches to promote student engagement. Education Sciences, 12(6), Article 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060415
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, Article 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
Mystakidis, S. (2019). Motivation enhanced deep and meaningful learning with social virtual reality.
Ní Bhroin, Ó., & King, F. (2020). Teacher education for inclusive education: a framework for developing collaboration for the inclusion of students with support plans. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 38-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1691993
Pisarenko, V. (2017). Teaching a foreign language using videos. Social Sciences, 6(4), 125. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/125
Pollock, M., Schmulian, A., & Coetzee, S. A. (2023). Do team-based written or video explanations of course content enhance accounting students' knowledge, communication, and teamwork skills? Journal of Accounting Education, 65, Article 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100873
Potter, B. N., & Johnston, C. G. (2006). The effect of interactive online learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.003
Race, P. (2019). The lecturer's toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429060205
Ray, A., Bala, P. K., & Dasgupta, S. A. (2019). Role of authenticity and perceived benefits of online courses on technology based career choice in India: A modified technology adoption model based on career theory. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.015
Reichert-Schlax, J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Frank, K., Brückner, S., Schneider, M., & Müller, A. (2023). Development and evaluation of digital learning tools promoting applicable knowledge in economics and german teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(5), Article 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050481
Rice, M. F., & Dunn, M. (2023). Inclusive online and distance education for learners with dis/abilities. In M. F. Rice & M. Dunn (Eds.), Inclusive online and distance education for learners with dis/abilities (pp. 1-6). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003412076
Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL)—past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 1061-1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5
Sato, S. N., Condes Moreno, E., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Dalamitros, A. A., Yañez-Sepulveda, R., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2023). Navigating the new normal: Adapting online and distance learning in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010019
Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, Article 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
Serrano, D. R., Dea‐Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez‐Burgos, E., Serrano‐Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology‐enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12330
Shyr, W. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Designing a technology‐enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students' self‐regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12213
Stefanski, A., Valli, L., & Jacobson, R. (2016). Beyond involvement and engagement: The role of the family in school–community partnerships. School Community Journal, 26(2), 135-160. http://www.adi.org/journal/2016fw/StefanskiValliJacobsonFall2016.pdf
van Merriënboer, J., & Kester, L. (2014). The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 104-148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.007
Viennet, R., & Pont, B. (2017). Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework (Working paper No. 162). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fc467a64-en
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., Erdmann, A., & Toro-Dupouy, L. (2023). Resilient sustainable investment in digital education technology: A stakeholder-centric decision support model under uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, Article 122282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122282
Zureick, A. H., Burk‐Rafel, J., Purkiss, J. A., & Hortsch, M. (2018). The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(4), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1754
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Weny Nurwendari, Yusrizal Yusrizal, Said Musnadi, Muhammad Yunus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
