Cultural Sensitivity and Teaching Competence: Examining Thai Students' Satisfaction with Non-Native English-Speaking Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.2.697.714Keywords:
teaching competence, native and non-native English teachers, motivation, learning outcomesAbstract
Aim. Despite the growing presence of non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom, little is known about how their teaching impacts student satisfaction, motivation, and confidence. While much of the existing research focuses on comparisons between native and non-native teachers, this study shifts the focus to how Thai students perceive NNESTs' teaching competence, communication skills, English proficiency, and pedagogical strategies. It also explores how these perceptions influence students' engagement and willingness to use English.
Method. This qualitative study was conducted at an autonomous university in southern Thailand, where students were randomly assigned to either native or non-native English-speaking teachers. A phenomenological approach was used to examine the experiences of 432 second-year students who had been taught by NNESTs for at least one full academic year. Reflective essays were collected, allowing students to share their insights on classroom interactions, teaching methods, and overall satisfaction. Data were analysed thematically to identify key patterns in student experiences.
Results. Students valued NNESTs for their structured lessons, clear explanations, encouragement, and ability to relate to the challenges of learning English. Most students felt that NNESTs' cultural insights and supportive teaching styles created an engaging and comfortable learning environment. However, some students struggled with fast-paced instruction, accent variations, and repetitive teaching approaches, which occasionally made learning difficult. Effective NNESTs were those who adapted their teaching methods, provided constructive feedback, and fostered a classroom atmosphere where students felt comfortable making mistakes.
Conclusion. The findings indicate that students place greater emphasis on teaching quality and cultural sensitivity than on native-speaker status, which points to the importance of professional development programs that strengthen NNESTs’ instructional flexibility and communicative competence.
Downloads
References
Adara, R. A. (2020). The differences in Indonesian ESL students’ motivation and perceptions of NEST and NNEST. JET (Journal of English Teaching) Adi Buana, 5(01), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v5.n01.2020.2139
Al-Nawrasy, O. (2013). The effect of native and nonnative English language teachers on secondary students’ achievement in speaking skills. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 243-254. https://jjes.yu.edu.jo/index.php/jjes/article/view/541
Apridayani, A., Han, W., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Understanding students’ self-regulated learning and anxiety in online English courses in higher education. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e17469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17469
Barany, L. K. S., & Zebari, Z. T. (2018). English language learners' opinions of EFL native and nonnative teachers. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 7(3), 154-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v7n3a220
Bing, X., Gao, X., & Yang, Z. (2023). Higher education students perceptions of NNESTs’ language proficiency: Will it affect their learning effectiveness?. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1106066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106066
Boonsuk, Y. (2016). Thai university students, teachers and program administrators, construction of nativeness in English language teaching [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton]. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/394824/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler, Y. G. (2007). How are nonnative‐English‐speaking teachers perceived by young learners?. TESOL quarterly, 41(4), 731-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00101.x
Colmenero, K., & Lasagabaster, D. (2023). The native/non-native teacher debate: insights into variables at play. Language awareness, 32(2), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2110253
Deng, L. (2024). Exploring the effect of students’ language learning strategies on Chinese students' perceptions of native and non-native English speaker teachers. System, 123, Article 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103330
Deng, L., Zhang, L. J., & Mohamed, N. (2023). Exploring native and non-native English speaker teachers’ perceptions of English teacher qualities and their students’ responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1175379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175379
Elyas, T., & Alghofaili, N. M. (2019). Native English speakers versus non-native English speakers: The impact of language teachers on EFL learner's English proficiency. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1773
Esteban, C. M. R., & del Cerro, J. S. (2020). Calidad de la docencia: La satisfacción del alumnado universitario con sus profeso [Teaching quality: The satisfaction of university students with their professors]. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
Fuangkarn, K., & Rimkeeratikul, S. (2020). An observational study on the Effects of native English-Speaking Teachers and non-native English-Speaking teachers on students’ english proficiency and perceptions. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 11(3), 241-259. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.15
Hayes, D. (2010). Language learning, teaching and educational reform in rural Thailand: An English teacher's perspective. Asia pacific journal of education, 30(3), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2010.495843
Imsa-Ard, P. (2020). Motivation and attitudes towards English language learning in Thailand: A large-scale survey of secondary school students. rEFLections, 27(2), 140-161. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.247153
Jang, H., & Wood, J. (2019). Native vs. non-native English speaking teachers: An analysis of business schools in the tertiary education sector. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16, 944-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.11.944
Javadi, M. (2020). Differences in teaching styles and oral language proficiency of non-native English speaker teachers: As perceived by the Iranian EFL students. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 10-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.56498/21202093
Jumsai Na Ayudhya, P. (2021). Self-Perceptions of Non-Native Students in an Undergraduate TESOL Program. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 58-71. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v14y2021i7p58.html
Kelch, K., & Santana-Williamson, E. (2002). ESL students’ attitudes toward native-and nonnative-speaking instructors’ accents. The CATESOL Journal, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5070/B5.36411
Kirkpatrick, A. (2010). English as a lingua franca in ASEAN: A multilingual model (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.
Llurda, E., & Calvet-Terré, J. (2024). Native-speakerism and non-native second language teachers: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 57(2), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000271
Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who's worth more?. ELT journal, 46(4), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.4.340
Moussu, L., & Llurda, E. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language teaching, 41(3), 315-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005028
Ng, J. M., & Tajoda-Edwards, H. (2015). In the Thai students’ eyes: Non-native English-speaking teachers’ pedagogical and linguistic qualities and students’ learning outcomes. ASEAN Journal of Management and Innovation, 8(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.14456/ajmi.2021.14
Okuda, T. (2019). Student perceptions of non-native English speaking tutors at a writing center in Japan. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.01.002
Rasyid, F., Ibna Seraj, P. M., Ghofur, A., & Asrifan, A. (2023). Students’ Perception toward Teaching Strategies of Native and Nonnative English‐Speaking Teachers: A Case Study in Indonesia. Education Research International, 2023(1), Article 7827917. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7827917
Sherry, A. C., Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1998). Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction: A quantitative and a qualitative measure. American Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649809527002
Pae, T-. I. (2017). Effects of the differences between native and non-native English-speaking teachers on students' attitudes and motivation toward learning English. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1235012
Phothongsunan, S., & Suwanarak, K. (2008). Native and non-native dichotomy: Distinctive stances of Thai teachers of English. Abac Journal, 28(2), 10-30. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/abacjournal/article/view/540
Qiu, X., & Fang, C. (2022). Creating an effective English-Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom: Chinese undergraduate students’ perceptions of native and non-native English-speaking content teachers and their experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 641-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1707769
Roman, I. (2014). Qualitative methods for determining students’ satisfaction with teaching quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 825-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.320
Stolz, S. A. (2023). The practice of phenomenology in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(7), 822-834. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2138745
Sung, C. C. M. (2014). An exploratory study of Hong Kong students’ perceptions of native and non-native English-speaking teachers in ELT. Asian Englishes, 16(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2014.880252
Suwarni, S., Moerdiono, A., Prihatining, I., & Sangadji, E. M. (2020). The effect of lecturers’ competency on students’ satisfaction through perceived teaching quality. KnE Social Sciences, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i9.7311
Tsang, A. (2020). Why English accents and pronunciation ‘still’ matter for teachers nowadays: a mixed-methods study on learners’ perceptions. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1600528
Walkinshaw, I., & Oanh, D. H. (2014). Native and non-native English language teachers: Student perceptions in Vietnam and Japan. Sage Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014534451
Waluyo, B., & Kusumastuti, S. (2024). Generative AI in student English learning in Thai higher education: More engagement, better outcomes?. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101146
Wu, Y. C., Hsieh, L. F., & Lu, J. J. (2015). What's the relationship between learning satisfaction and continuing learning intention?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2849-2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.148
Xu, L., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Students’ perceptions of native/non-native English-speaking EMI teachers: Are NS teachers better than NNS teachers? Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1082600. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1082600
Yin, H., Wang, W., & Han, J. (2016). Chinese undergraduates’ perceptions of teaching quality and the effects on approaches to studying and course satisfaction. Higher Education, 71, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9887-5
Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Learners’ satisfaction with native and non-native English-speaking teachers’ teaching competence and their learning motivation: a path-analytic approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 558-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1833834
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Henry E. Lemana II, Budi Waluyo, Crizjale V. Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
